SAS vs Virgin Atlantic
SAS scores 8.8/10 against Virgin Atlantic at 7/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare.
By Jon Miksis · cabin data verified · fares for travel November 8–14, 2026
Best product each one flies
Scored on what can be verified. Service, food and ground recovery are absent deliberately: they need someone in the seat, and they live in the reviews rather than here.
One caveat on the Value line, stated rather than buried: the cabin scores describe a business product and the fares behind Value are economy. A carrier that prices economy aggressively generally prices business the same way, but they are different products. Read Value as how an airline prices against its competitors, not as what its business seat costs.
SAS
A330-300 / A350-900
- Seat
- 8/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 9/10
- Product score
- 8.8/10
Virgin Atlantic
A330neo (Upper Class Suite)
- Seat
- 10/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 0/10
- Product score
- 7/10
Dimension by dimension
Seat: Virgin Atlantic
8/10 on the A330-300 / A350-900 against 10/10 on the A330neo (Upper Class Suite).
IFE: level
Screens, connectivity and power: 8/10 against 8/10.
Lounge & bags: level
What the fare includes before you board: 10/10 against 10/10.
Value: SAS
Median premium over the cheapest carrier on the same route: 9/10 against 0/10.
Where both were priced on the same dates
Every fare is November 8–14, 2026, so a difference between two rows is a difference between two airlines and nothing else. These are economy fares, while the cabin scores above describe the business product — read them as how each airline prices against its competitors, not as what its business seat costs.
| Route | Cabin | SAS | Virgin Atlantic | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOS → LHR | economy | $636 | $815 | SAS by $179 |
| JFK → LHR | economy | $664 | $815 | SAS by $151 |
| JFK → MAN | economy | $732 | $1090 | SAS by $358 |
| LAX → LHR | economy | $813 | $1310 | SAS by $497 |
What happens if the aircraft swaps
Both carriers are paying-the-same-fare-either-way propositions on some frames. The worst product each one flies:
SAS
A330-300 / A350-900
- Seat
- 8/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 9/10
- Product score
- 8.8/10
Virgin Atlantic
A350-1000 / 787-9
- Seat
- 8/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 0/10
- Product score
- 6.5/10
SAS: Thompson Vantage XL in a staggered 1-2-1 on both widebodies, so the product does not change with the frame.
Virgin Atlantic: Still 1-2-1 with direct aisle access, but no closing door: the A350 uses a privacy panel and an 82-inch bed, the 787-9 an older herringbone with manual bed conversion.
Common questions
- Is SAS or Virgin Atlantic better to Europe?
- SAS scores 8.8/10 against Virgin Atlantic at 7/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare. On the four dimensions we can verify, SAS wins 1 and Virgin Atlantic wins 1. Service and food are not scored here because they cannot be read off a spec sheet.
- Which is cheaper, SAS or Virgin Atlantic?
- On the 4 routes where both were priced for the same week (November 8–14, 2026), SAS was cheaper on 4 and Virgin Atlantic on 0. Every pair of fares is the same departure and return date in the same cabin, so the difference is the airline rather than the dates or the cabin.
- Does the aircraft change the answer?
- Yes. Virgin Atlantic scores 10/10 on the A330neo (Upper Class Suite) and 8/10 on the A350-1000 / 787-9. Check the equipment on your date before deciding.
- Has Jon flown either of these?
- Neither, so this page is product facts and fares only. Any review we publish of either will be labeled Researched until that changes.
Join the Club, free
One email a week: the Europe fares worth acting on, the new transatlantic routes, and first look at the tools. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
