Royal Air Maroc vs TAP Air Portugal
The best documented business seats both score 8/10. That measures bed, aisle access and privacy door; it does not make the entire cabins identical.
By Jon Miksis · comparison updated
This page contains affiliate links. If you sign up or book through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what we recommend, or the order we recommend it in. Full disclosure.
What matters for your booking
Business fares
Of 21 shared business routes, Royal Air Maroc was cheaper on 9, TAP Air Portugal on 12, and 0 were the same price.
Economy fares
Of 15 shared economy routes, Royal Air Maroc was cheaper on 5, TAP Air Portugal on 10, and 0 were the same price.
Start with your route and cabin. A fare advantage in economy does not establish a business-class bargain, and a better seat does not establish that a connection or a higher fare is worth it for your trip.
The business seats being compared
These are each airline’s best-scoring documented business aircraft. The fare grid does not identify aircraft, so the seat below is not promised with any fare in the table. Service and food require a separate firsthand review.
Royal Air Maroc
787-9
- Seat layout
- 1-2-1
- Fully flat bed
- Yes
- Direct aisle access at every seat
- Yes
- Privacy door
- No
- Seat score
- 8/10
- Wi-Fi
- Paid in the recorded product
- Lounge access
- Included in the recorded fare
- Checked bags
- 2
Cabin checked .
Recorded source: The Points Guy 787-9 review, Frugal Flyer 787-9 v2 review (Collins Super Diamond).
TAP Air Portugal
A330-900neo
- Seat layout
- 1-2-1
- Fully flat bed
- Yes
- Direct aisle access at every seat
- Yes
- Privacy door
- No
- Seat score
- 8/10
- Wi-Fi
- Paid in the recorded product
- Lounge access
- Included in the recorded fare
- Checked bags
- 2
Cabin checked .
Recorded source: TAP Fly in Business pages, A330neo seat maps.
Seat scores describe bed, aisle access and privacy door only. Read the scoring method. A tie does not compare comfort, food, service or reliability.
Check the aircraft on Royal Air Maroc
787-9: 8/10 for the seat. The 787-8 carries an older, denser cabin where window passengers climb past a neighbor. Its seat specification was not established well enough to record, so it is flagged here rather than scored. Recorded September 1, 2026.
Check the aircraft on TAP Air Portugal
A330-900neo: 8/10 for the seat. The A321LR also flies US-Europe and runs an alternating 2-2 and 1-1 layout, so not every seat has direct aisle access on that aircraft. Recorded August 30, 2026.
A321LR: 5/10 for the seat. Solo throne seats in the 1-1 rows; the 2-2 rows require stepping over a neighbor. Recorded August 30, 2026.
Compare the fares and the routing
Each row compares the same airports, cabin, travel dates and observation date. It can still compare a nonstop against a connection. Journey times, aircraft, baggage allowances and change rules were not recorded with these fares; check those before treating the price difference as a saving.
Showing 12 of 21 matched business routes. Round trip per person in USD, for travel November 8–14, 2026.
| Route and observation date | Royal Air Maroc | TAP Air Portugal | Price difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Washington DC (IAD) → Munich (MUC) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,308Connects via CMN | $3,657Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $651 less |
Miami (MIA) → London Gatwick (LGW) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $5,181Connects via CMN | $3,695Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $1,486 less |
Washington DC (IAD) → Frankfurt (FRA) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,807Connects via CMN | $3,737Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $1,070 less |
New York (JFK) → Lisbon (LIS) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $3,796Connects via CMN | $4,023Nonstop | Royal Air Maroc was $227 less |
New York (JFK) → Valencia (VLC) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,386Connects via CMN | $3,944Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $442 less |
Washington DC (IAD) → Amsterdam (AMS) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,301Connects via CMN | $3,959Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $342 less |
Miami (MIA) → Lisbon (LIS) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $3,976Connects via CMN | $4,784Nonstop | Royal Air Maroc was $808 less |
Miami (MIA) → Milan Malpensa (MXP) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,817Connects via CMN | $3,985Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $832 less |
Washington DC (IAD) → Barcelona (BCN) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,043Connects via CMN | $5,232Connects via LIS | Royal Air Maroc was $1,189 less |
Washington DC (IAD) → Valencia (VLC) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,087Connects via CMN | $4,950Connects via LIS | Royal Air Maroc was $863 less |
New York (JFK) → Nice (NCE) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,227Connects via CMN | $4,156Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $71 less |
Miami (MIA) → Valencia (VLC) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,749Connects via CMN | $4,208Connects via LIS | TAP Air Portugal was $541 less |
Your airport missing? Check the full route tool for the airlines we observed there. Confirm current fares, journey time, baggage and ticket rules before booking.
Before paying for the ticket
- Check the exact operating airline and seat map on every long flight, including the return. An airline name or business-class label alone does not guarantee a flat bed or aisle access.
- Compare total journey time and connection length. A lower fare may buy a much longer trip.
- Reprice with your bags, preferred seats and change rules included. These observations do not establish that the tickets have identical restrictions.
- Check other airlines on the route. Being cheaper than the other airline on this page does not establish the cheapest fare in the market.
Common questions
- Is Royal Air Maroc or TAP Air Portugal better in business class to Europe?
- The best documented business seats both score 8/10. That measures bed, aisle access and privacy door; it does not make the entire cabins identical. Of 21 shared business routes, Royal Air Maroc was cheaper on 9, TAP Air Portugal on 12, and 0 were the same price. Service and food are not scored in this comparison. These are observations for travel November 8–14, 2026, not current quotes.
- Which is cheaper, Royal Air Maroc or TAP Air Portugal?
- Of 21 shared business routes, Royal Air Maroc was cheaper on 9, TAP Air Portugal on 12, and 0 were the same price. Of 15 shared economy routes, Royal Air Maroc was cheaper on 5, TAP Air Portugal on 10, and 0 were the same price. Both counts refer to travel November 8–14, 2026. A cheaper fare may involve a connection; compare the itinerary as well as the price.
- Will I get the business seat shown here?
- These cards describe the named aircraft in our cabin records, not a seat guaranteed on every flight. At least one of these airlines has a recorded aircraft or cabin variation. Check the operating airline, seat map and aircraft for every segment before paying; equipment can change. The fare observations do not record the aircraft.
- Has Jon flown these business cabins?
- Royal Air Maroc business class is not on Jon’s confirmed flown roster. TAP Air Portugal business class is on Jon’s confirmed flown roster. That records the airline and cabin, not every aircraft or itinerary. This page compares documented specifications and dated fares.
Join the Club, free
One email a week: the Europe fares worth acting on, the new transatlantic routes, and first look at the tools. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.