Iberia vs SAS
On the best documented aircraft, Iberia scores 10/10 for the business seat and SAS 8/10. The aircraft on your booking decides whether those seats apply.
By Jon Miksis · comparison updated
This page contains affiliate links. If you sign up or book through them we may earn a commission, at no extra cost to you. It never changes what we recommend, or the order we recommend it in. Full disclosure.
What matters for your booking
Business fares
Of 11 shared business routes, Iberia was cheaper on 1, SAS on 10, and 0 were the same price.
Economy fares
Of 21 shared economy routes, Iberia was cheaper on 4, SAS on 17, and 0 were the same price.
Start with your route and cabin. A fare advantage in economy does not establish a business-class bargain, and a better seat does not establish that a connection or a higher fare is worth it for your trip.
The business seats being compared
These are each airline’s best-scoring documented business aircraft. The fare grid does not identify aircraft, so the seat below is not promised with any fare in the table. Service and food require a separate firsthand review.
Iberia
A350 Next (Recaro CL6720)
- Seat layout
- 1-2-1
- Fully flat bed
- Yes
- Direct aisle access at every seat
- Yes
- Privacy door
- Yes
- Seat score
- 10/10
- Wi-Fi
- Paid in the recorded product
- Lounge access
- Included in the recorded fare
- Checked bags
- 2
Cabin checked .
Recorded source: Iberia seat-type pages, A350 and A330 seat maps.
SAS
A330-300 / A350-900
- Seat layout
- 1-2-1
- Fully flat bed
- Yes
- Direct aisle access at every seat
- Yes
- Privacy door
- No
- Seat score
- 8/10
- Wi-Fi
- Paid in the recorded product
- Lounge access
- Included in the recorded fare
- Checked bags
- 2
Cabin checked .
Recorded source: SAS long-haul business pages, A330 and A350 seat maps.
Seat scores describe bed, aisle access and privacy door only. Read the scoring method. A tie does not compare comfort, food, service or reliability.
Check the aircraft on Iberia
A350 Next (Recaro CL6720): 10/10 for the seat. Only a small part of the A350 fleet has the door. Standard A350s and the A330 use the older Stelia Solstys seat: still 1-2-1 and still lie-flat, but open to the aisle. Recorded August 30, 2026.
A330 / standard A350 (Stelia Solstys): 8/10 for the seat. Same 1-2-1 lie-flat layout, no closing door. Recorded August 30, 2026.
Check the aircraft on SAS
A330-300 / A350-900: 8/10 for the seat. This record covers the two named widebodies. SAS also documents an A321LR business cabin; this row does not establish its layout or the seat on a European connection. Check both directions of your booking. Recorded August 30, 2026.
Compare the fares and the routing
Each row compares the same airports, cabin, travel dates and observation date. It can still compare a nonstop against a connection. Journey times, aircraft, baggage allowances and change rules were not recorded with these fares; check those before treating the price difference as a saving.
Showing 11 of 11 matched business routes. Round trip per person in USD, for travel November 8–14, 2026.
| Route and observation date | Iberia | SAS | Price difference |
|---|---|---|---|
New York (JFK) → Prague (PRG) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $4,360Connects via MAD | $5,551Connects via CPH | Iberia was $1,191 less |
Miami (MIA) → Prague (PRG) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $6,176Connects via MAD | $4,982Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,194 less |
Miami (MIA) → Nice (NCE) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $7,012Connects via MAD | $5,044Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,968 less |
New York (JFK) → Seville (SVQ) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $6,287Connects via MAD | $5,190Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,097 less |
Chicago (ORD) → Nice (NCE) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $7,820Connects via MAD | $5,679Connects via CPH | SAS was $2,141 less |
Miami (MIA) → Seville (SVQ) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $8,424Connects via MAD | $5,689Connects via CPH | SAS was $2,735 less |
Los Angeles (LAX) → Seville (SVQ) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $6,918Connects via MAD | $5,895Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,023 less |
Boston (BOS) → Milan Malpensa (MXP) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $7,161Connects via MAD | $5,901Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,260 less |
Chicago (ORD) → Madrid (MAD) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $11,115Nonstop | $5,975Connects via CPH | SAS was $5,140 less |
Chicago (ORD) → Seville (SVQ) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $7,636Connects via MAD | $5,988Connects via CPH | SAS was $1,648 less |
Boston (BOS) → Seville (SVQ) Observed September 1, 2026 Compare all observed airlines | $6,653Connects via MAD | $6,340Connects via CPH | SAS was $313 less |
Your airport missing? Check the full route tool for the airlines we observed there. Confirm current fares, journey time, baggage and ticket rules before booking.
Before paying for the ticket
- Check the exact operating airline and seat map on every long flight, including the return. An airline name or business-class label alone does not guarantee a flat bed or aisle access.
- Compare total journey time and connection length. A lower fare may buy a much longer trip.
- Reprice with your bags, preferred seats and change rules included. These observations do not establish that the tickets have identical restrictions.
- Check other airlines on the route. Being cheaper than the other airline on this page does not establish the cheapest fare in the market.
Common questions
- Is Iberia or SAS better in business class to Europe?
- On the best documented aircraft, Iberia scores 10/10 for the business seat and SAS 8/10. The aircraft on your booking decides whether those seats apply. Of 11 shared business routes, Iberia was cheaper on 1, SAS on 10, and 0 were the same price. Service and food are not scored in this comparison. These are observations for travel November 8–14, 2026, not current quotes.
- Which is cheaper, Iberia or SAS?
- Of 11 shared business routes, Iberia was cheaper on 1, SAS on 10, and 0 were the same price. Of 21 shared economy routes, Iberia was cheaper on 4, SAS on 17, and 0 were the same price. Both counts refer to travel November 8–14, 2026. A cheaper fare may involve a connection; compare the itinerary as well as the price.
- Will I get the business seat shown here?
- These cards describe the named aircraft in our cabin records, not a seat guaranteed on every flight. At least one of these airlines has a recorded aircraft or cabin variation. Check the operating airline, seat map and aircraft for every segment before paying; equipment can change. The fare observations do not record the aircraft.
- Has Jon flown these business cabins?
- Iberia business class is not on Jon’s confirmed flown roster. SAS business class is not on Jon’s confirmed flown roster. That records the airline and cabin, not every aircraft or itinerary. This page compares documented specifications and dated fares.
Join the Club, free
One email a week: the Europe fares worth acting on, the new transatlantic routes, and first look at the tools. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.