Brussels Airlines vs Royal Jordanian
Royal Jordanian scores 9.3/10 against Brussels Airlines at 7.3/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare.
By Jon Miksis · cabin data verified · fares for travel November 8–14, 2026
Best product each one flies
Scored on what can be verified. Service, food and ground recovery are absent deliberately: they need someone in the seat, and they live in the reviews rather than here.
One caveat on the Value line, stated rather than buried: Value is computed from business fares, and a carrier with too few of them does not get a Value score at all. Where you see a dash, we have fewer than three priced business routes for that airline and did not want to invent a figure from one or two — so its product score is the mean of three dimensions rather than four, and it is not directly comparable to a score built on hundreds of fares. The airlines with the most fares behind them are named on the business-class ranking.
Brussels Airlines
A330-300
- Seat
- 5/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 6/10
- Product score
- 7.3/10
Royal Jordanian
787-9
- Seat
- 10/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 9/10
- Product score
- 9.3/10
Dimension by dimension
Seat: Royal Jordanian
5/10 on the A330-300 against 10/10 on the 787-9.
IFE: level
Screens, connectivity and power: 8/10 against 8/10.
Lounge & bags: level
What the fare includes before you board: 10/10 against 10/10.
Value: Royal Jordanian
Median premium over the cheapest carrier on the same route: 6/10 against 9/10.
What happens if the aircraft swaps
Both carriers are paying-the-same-fare-either-way propositions on some frames. The worst product each one flies:
Brussels Airlines
A330-300
- Seat
- 5/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 6/10
- Product score
- 7.3/10
Royal Jordanian
787-8 (Crown Class)
- Seat
- 5/10
- IFE
- 8/10
- Lounge & bags
- 10/10
- Value
- 9/10
- Product score
- 8/10
Brussels Airlines: Thompson Vantage in a staggered 2-2-1 / 1-2-1 pattern. 24 of the 30 seats reach an aisle directly, so the field is false — it means every seat. This carrier was left unverified on the first pass because sources disagreed; a later source resolved it with the 24-of-30 figure.
Royal Jordanian: Collins Diamond, 24 seats, the cabin the 787-9 is replacing.
Common questions
- Is Brussels Airlines or Royal Jordanian better to Europe?
- Royal Jordanian scores 9.3/10 against Brussels Airlines at 7.3/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare. On the four dimensions we can verify, Brussels Airlines wins 0 and Royal Jordanian wins 2. Service and food are not scored here because they cannot be read off a spec sheet.
- Does the aircraft change the answer?
- Yes. Royal Jordanian scores 10/10 on the 787-9 and 5/10 on the 787-8 (Crown Class). Check the equipment on your date before deciding.
- Has Jon flown either of these?
- Neither, so this page is product facts and fares only. Any review we publish of either will be labeled Researched until that changes.
Join the Club, free
One email a week: the Europe fares worth acting on, the new transatlantic routes, and first look at the tools. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
