Skip to content
Europe Flight Club
Head to head

Austrian vs Royal Jordanian

Royal Jordanian scores 9.3/10 against Austrian at 8.3/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare.

By Jon Miksis · cabin data verified · fares for travel November 8–14, 2026

Best product each one flies

Scored on what can be verified. Service, food and ground recovery are absent deliberately: they need someone in the seat, and they live in the reviews rather than here.

One caveat on the Value line, stated rather than buried: Value is computed from business fares, and a carrier with too few of them does not get a Value score at all. Where you see a dash, we have fewer than three priced business routes for that airline and did not want to invent a figure from one or two — so its product score is the mean of three dimensions rather than four, and it is not directly comparable to a score built on hundreds of fares. The airlines with the most fares behind them are named on the business-class ranking.

Austrian

787-9

Seat
8/10
IFE
8/10
Lounge & bags
10/10
Value
7/10
Product score
8.3/10

Royal Jordanian

787-9

Seat
10/10
IFE
8/10
Lounge & bags
10/10
Value
9/10
Product score
9.3/10

Dimension by dimension

  • Seat: Royal Jordanian

    8/10 on the 787-9 against 10/10 on the 787-9.

  • IFE: level

    Screens, connectivity and power: 8/10 against 8/10.

  • Lounge & bags: level

    What the fare includes before you board: 10/10 against 10/10.

  • Value: Royal Jordanian

    Median premium over the cheapest carrier on the same route: 7/10 against 9/10.

Where both were priced on the same dates

Every fare is November 8–14, 2026, so a difference between two rows is a difference between two airlines and nothing else. These are economy fares, while the cabin scores above describe the business product — read them as how each airline prices against its competitors, not as what its business seat costs.

RouteCabinAustrianRoyal JordanianCheaper
IAD → ATHeconomy$1062$933Royal Jordanian by $129
IAD → ATHbusiness$6119$5595Royal Jordanian by $524

What happens if the aircraft swaps

Both carriers are paying-the-same-fare-either-way propositions on some frames. The worst product each one flies:

Austrian

777-200ER

Seat
5/10
IFE
8/10
Lounge & bags
10/10
Value
7/10
Product score
7.5/10

Royal Jordanian

787-8 (Crown Class)

Seat
5/10
IFE
8/10
Lounge & bags
10/10
Value
9/10
Product score
8/10

Austrian: Thompson Vantage in alternating 1-2-1 and 2-2-2 rows. Recorded as no direct aisle access because the field means every seat, and here it is row-dependent.

Royal Jordanian: Collins Diamond, 24 seats, the cabin the 787-9 is replacing.

Common questions

Is Austrian or Royal Jordanian better to Europe?
Royal Jordanian scores 9.3/10 against Austrian at 8.3/10 on seat, screens, lounge and fare. On the four dimensions we can verify, Austrian wins 0 and Royal Jordanian wins 2. Service and food are not scored here because they cannot be read off a spec sheet.
Which is cheaper, Austrian or Royal Jordanian?
On the 2 routes where both were priced for the same week (November 8–14, 2026), Austrian was cheaper on 0 and Royal Jordanian on 2. Every pair of fares is the same departure and return date in the same cabin, so the difference is the airline rather than the dates or the cabin.
Does the aircraft change the answer?
Yes. Austrian scores 8/10 on the 787-9 and 5/10 on the 777-200ER. Royal Jordanian scores 10/10 on the 787-9 and 5/10 on the 787-8 (Crown Class). Check the equipment on your date before deciding.
Has Jon flown either of these?
Neither, so this page is product facts and fares only. Any review we publish of either will be labeled Researched until that changes.

Join the Club, free

One email a week: the Europe fares worth acting on, the new transatlantic routes, and first look at the tools. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.